Bridge Loan Underwriting: When It Fits, When It Kills You
Exit DSCR, refinance risk, and the three scenarios where bridge debt actually makes sense.
Bridge debt is the most overused capital structure in commercial real estate. It looks attractive — fast close, high leverage, interest-only — and that is exactly why it kills deals when the take-out doesn't happen on schedule. Bridge loan underwriting is fundamentally different from permanent-loan underwriting because the entire thesis depends on a refinance event 12–36 months out.
A defensible bridge underwriting tests three exits: agency-stabilized take-out, bank-portfolio take-out, and a sale at a stressed cap rate. If two of three pencil at the projected NOI, the bridge works. If only one pencils, you are betting the deal on a single execution path — and that is where bridge borrowers lose properties.
The other half of bridge underwriting is the rate-cap math. Most bridge loans require a rate cap, and the cost of that cap has tripled since 2022. We have seen deals where a 3-year rate cap costs more than the first 12 months of debt service. If your bridge model assumes a 2021-era rate cap cost, the deal is upside-down before you close.
Full guide coming soon. Want a bridge-vs-permanent comparison on a specific deal today? Run a free screening — every Full report tests both structures.
Ready to underwrite? Run a free screen →
Paste a Crexi link or upload your documents. Lender-ready report in under 2 minutes.
Underwriting Commercial / SBA?
See the full commercial / sba workflow — asset-specific metrics, lender programs, and risk flags.
See Commercial / SBA underwriting →